On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 01:47:44PM +0100, Irina Tirdea wrote: > Add ESD (Electrostatic Discharge) protection mechanism. > > The driver enables ESD protection in HW and checks a register > to determine if ESD occurred. If ESD is signalled by the HW, > the driver will reset the device. > > The ESD poll time (in ms) can be set through > esd-recovery-timeout-ms ACPI/DT property. If it is set to 0, > ESD protection is disabled. > > Signed-off-by: Irina Tirdea <irina.tirdea@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../bindings/input/touchscreen/goodix.txt | 4 + > drivers/input/touchscreen/goodix.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++- > 2 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/goodix.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/goodix.txt > index 9e4ff69..9132ee0 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/goodix.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/touchscreen/goodix.txt > @@ -19,6 +19,10 @@ Optional properties: > > - device-config : device configuration information (specified as byte > array). Maximum size is 240 bytes. > + - esd-recovery-timeout-ms : ESD poll time (in milli seconds) for the driver to > + check if ESD occurred and in that case reset the > + device. ESD is disabled if this property is not set > + or is set to 0. This sounds like software configuration rather than HW description. Is there any reason this needs to be a DT property? Can we not just choose a sensible default and allow this to be overridden dynamically? Mark. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
