RE: [PATCH v3] Fix endian issues and remove the board specific codes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, Dmitry,

Thanks for your comments. 
Here are my replies for some comments.

> +	fw_id = ((fw_chunk_info.chunk_info.version_number >> 12) & 0xF);
> +	chip_id = (((dev_wdt87xx->sys_param.fw_id) >> 12) & 0xF);
> +
> +	if (fw_id != chip_id) {
> +		wdt87xx_get_sysparam(client, dev_wdt87xx);

>Why would it be different now?
This driver is intend to support two controllers, WDT8753 & WDT8756. 
The chip_id and the the firmware are different for them, so we have to check if 
The firmware is suitable for this controller.

> +
> +	return (unsigned short) y;

>I think I might have asked this before, by anyway: are we sure that we don't already have this checksum implementation in lib/? And if we don't maybe we should?
The MISR is a checksum function which the full name is "Multiple Input Signature Register". 
I checked the kernel library and not found any algorithm like this.
You mean I have to submit the checksum function into kernel/lib ?

> Can you tell me a bit more about the way device sends touch data? Does it always send all 10 contacts regardless of data in raw_buf[TOUCH_PK_OFFSET_FNGR_NUM]?
Yes, it always send all 10 contacts data.


Best Regards,
Hn.chen.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux