On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 12:23:03AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> Hello Benjamin,
>>
>> On 04/15/2015 11:20 PM, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
>> > Hi guys,
>> >
>> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> Hello Dmitry,
>> >>
>> >> On 04/08/2015 02:26 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>> >>> This change allows atmel_mxt_ts to bind to ACPI-enumerated devices in
>> >>> Google Pixel 2 (2015).
>> >>>
>> >>> While newer version of ACPI standard allow use of device-tree-like
>> >>> properties in device descriptions, the version of ACPI implemented in
>> >>> Google BIOS does not support them, and we have to resort to DMI data to
>> >>> specify exact characteristics of the devices (touchpad vs. touchscreen,
>> >>> GPIO to button mapping, etc).
>> >>>
>> >>> Pixel 1 continues to use i2c devices and platform data created by
>> >>> chromeos-laptop driver, since ACPI does not enumerate them.
>> >>>
>> >>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >>> ---
>> > [snipped]
>> >>
>> >> Patch looks good to me and I've tested it in a Pixel2 Chromebook using
>> >> evtest:
>> >>
>> >> Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >>
>> >
>> > Hmm, this is weird. I tried to apply the 2 patches of this series to a
>> > 4.0 fedora kernel[1], and the touch{pad|screen} are desperately muted.
>>
>> Yes, is not going to work with just 4.0, I tested with today's -next.
>>
>> > The abs_X/Y max shows up as 0, so there is something wrong with either
>> > my touchpad (which works fine on ChromeOS) or with the driver.
>> > There are no differences between 4.0-rcX and the final 4.0 so I suspect
>> > there must be something else.
>> > I also copied the 2 samus-* config files from the ChromeOS root to
>> > /lib/firmware but this does not change anything.
>> >
>> > In [3], I enabled the debug output of atmel_mxt, and it seems that the
>> > table of functions is missing the T9 one, which is the multitouch one... :(
>> >
>>
>> The atmel_mxt error message is somehow misleading. The problem is not
>> that the T9 multitouch object is missing (in fact that's the only one
>> supported by the driver in 4.0) but that the atmel chip in the pixel2
>> uses another multitouch object (T100).
>>
>> So the driver tries to initialize the input device assuming that is a
>> T9 one and fails showing the "Invalid object type T9" error.
>>
>> > Any help would be greatly appreciated so we can fix [2] and support
>> > those laptops in Fedora directly.
>> >
>>
>> Patches to add proper T100 support are already in Linus' tree but did
>> not make it to 4.0. So you need to cherry-pick commits:
>>
>> b23157dc7427 ("Input: atmel_mxt_ts - implement support for T100 touch object") [0]
>> b6d2d3289f84 ("Input: atmel_mxt_ts - split out touchpad initialisation logic") [1].
>>
>> Dmitry mentioned that he used a 4.0+ kernel with Fedora's config so I
>> guess he also was testing with linux-next or latest Linus' master.
>
> I usually test with my internal tree that consists of mainline (either
> at X.0 or at ToT past rc3-rc4 of the current release) + my "for-linus"
> branch + my "next" branch + some work in progress that has not made into
> for-linus/next but should have no effect on the patches as posted.
>
Oh... That was it. Thanks to both of you (especially for pointing the
2 patches).
I'll try this and request those to be included in F22.
Cheers,
Benjamin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
