On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 11:21:36PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Hi Sam, > > On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 04:10:16PM +0800, Sam hung wrote: > > --- > > drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c | 23 +++++++++++++---------- > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c b/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c > > index f2b9780..4891d07 100644 > > --- a/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c > > +++ b/drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c > > @@ -700,14 +700,14 @@ static int elantech_packet_check_v1(struct psmouse *psmouse) > > > > static int elantech_debounce_check_v2(struct psmouse *psmouse) > > { > > - /* > > - * When we encounter packet that matches this exactly, it means the > > - * hardware is in debounce status. Just ignore the whole packet. > > - */ > > - const u8 debounce_packet[] = { 0x84, 0xff, 0xff, 0x02, 0xff, 0xff }; > > - unsigned char *packet = psmouse->packet; > > - > > - return !memcmp(packet, debounce_packet, sizeof(debounce_packet)); > > + /* > > + * When we encounter packet that matches this exactly, it means the > > + * hardware is in debounce status. Just ignore the whole packet. > > + */ > > + const u8 debounce_packet[] = { 0x84, 0xff, 0xff, 0x02, 0xff, 0xff }; > > + unsigned char *packet = psmouse->packet; > > + > > + return !memcmp(packet, debounce_packet, sizeof(debounce_packet)); > > } > > Hmm, this chunk seems to be replacing spaces with tabs... I'd rather had > it separate from the hardware version changes. > > I'll pick up the chunk below though. Ah, I missed the fact that the patch does not have your "signed-off-by" signature (see Documentation/SubmittingPatches). Please resend with it. > > > > > static int elantech_packet_check_v2(struct psmouse *psmouse) > > @@ -1499,7 +1499,7 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id no_hw_res_dmi_table[] = { > > /* > > * determine hardware version and set some properties according to it. > > */ > > -static int elantech_set_properties(struct elantech_data *etd) > > +static int elantech_set_properties(struct psmouse *psmouse, struct elantech_data *etd) > > { > > /* This represents the version of IC body. */ > > int ver = (etd->fw_version & 0x0f0000) >> 16; > > @@ -1520,9 +1520,12 @@ static int elantech_set_properties(struct elantech_data *etd) > > case 7: > > case 8: > > case 9: > > + case 10: > > + case 13: > > etd->hw_version = 4; > > break; > > default: > > + psmouse_err(psmouse, "failed to setting hw version.\n"); The caller of elantech_set_properties() already issues message about unknown hardware version, why do we need to have it here as well? > > return -1; > > } > > } > > @@ -1593,7 +1596,7 @@ int elantech_init(struct psmouse *psmouse) > > } > > etd->fw_version = (param[0] << 16) | (param[1] << 8) | param[2]; > > > > - if (elantech_set_properties(etd)) { > > + if (elantech_set_properties(psmouse, etd)) { > > psmouse_err(psmouse, "unknown hardware version, aborting...\n"); > > goto init_fail; > > } > > -- > > 1.8.3.2 > > Thanks. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html