Hi,
On 09/15/2014 07:39 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 10:10:23AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 09/13/2014 02:26 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>>> Hi Hans,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:08:32AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>> +/* Always check for focaltech, this is safe as it uses pnp-id matching */
>>>> + if (psmouse_do_detect(focaltech_detect, psmouse, set_properties) == 0) {
>>>> + if (!set_properties || focaltech_init(psmouse) == 0) {
>>>> + /* Not supported yet, use bare protocol */
>>>> + psmouse_max_proto = PSMOUSE_PS2;
>>>
>>> I do not believe we need to muck with psmouse_max_proto here, so I'll
>>> drop it and apply.
>>
>> Oh, but we do need to set psmouse_max_proto, otherwise this won't work, as
>> I already tried to explain in the review of v1 (but clearly failed to do so).
>>
>> psmouse_initialize() checks psmouse_max_proto, and if it is not set to
>> PSMOUSE_PS2 does things which upsets these touchpads.
>
> Ouch.. so even basic set rate/set resolution messes it up?
Yes, this is one of the reasons why baking this patch took longer then
expected, because my initial version failed as it did not set psmouse_max_proto.
Regards,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
