Hi!
>
> Input: misc - Add driver for Intel Bay Trail GPIO buttons
>
> From: Lejun Zhu <lejun.zhu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This patch adds support for the GPIO buttons on some Intel Bay Trail
> tablets originally running Windows 8. The ACPI description of these
> buttons follows "Windows ACPI Design Guide for SoC Platforms".
Hmm. Is it time for x86 to adopt device tree? Because this is 200
lines of C code which should really have been 10 lines of .dts...
> +
> +/*
> + * Some of the buttons like volume up/down are auto repeat, while others
> + * are not. To support both, we register two platform devices, and put
> + * buttons into them based on whether the key should be auto repeat.
> + */
> +#define BUTTON_TYPES 2
> +
> +struct soc_button_data {
> + struct platform_device *children[BUTTON_TYPES];
> +};
Would it be possible to extend device description so that this hack is
not needed?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
