Ok, thanks David. -nestor On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 4:16 AM, David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Nestor Lopez Casado > <nlopezcasad@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> David, Jiri, >> >> After considering our discussion here, which is your position on >> extending the hidraw nodes to include separate nodes for top level >> vendor collections ? > > Patches, patches, patches! > > I am currently on the road, but it's always easier to see real code > than just the theory. I have no real objections to provide multiple > hidraw interfaces. However, I think that doesn't solve your problem. > For instance, you still need to set proper access-rights on the hidraw > node. However, some other devices might export unsafe interfaces via > vendor-extensions, and you don't wanna make those hidraw nodes > user-accessible. Therefore, you still need a udev-rule to match on > Logitech-stuff. You could do that as a small Logitech-driver in the > kernel. But ok, I'm fine with moving those whitelists to user-space. > > Thanks > David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
