On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 09:11:44PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jul 2012, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
> > H Lars, Thomas,
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 01:44:20PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> > > Since commit 1c6c69525b ("genirq: Reject bogus threaded irq requests") threaded
> > > IRQs without a primary handler need to be requested with IRQF_ONESHOT, otherwise
> > > the request will fail. This patch adds the IRQF_ONESHOT to IIO drivers where it
> > > is missing. Not modified by this patch are those drivers where the requested IRQ
> > > will always be a nested IRQ (e.g. because it's part of an MFD), since for this
> > > special case IRQF_ONESHOT is not required to be specified when requesting the
> > > IRQ.
> >
> > This is not very helpful. Why, instead of bailing out, genirq case does
> > not add IRQF_ONESHOT itself to the flags? Then we would not need to
> > alter zillions of drivers.
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/12/151
Hm, OK, Linus wins... I guess I need to queue this for 3.5 then...
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
