On 03/27/2012 09:22 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 03/26/2012 11:17 PM, Shridhar Rasal wrote: >> On 02/01/2012 01:17 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:29:35AM -0800, Stephen Warren wrote: ... >>>> I'd rather PIN_CFG_IGNORE was the first enum, so it gets value 0, or >>>> this probably won't solve the original issue? >>> >>> The benefit of current definition is that it is compatible with old >>> ones using bool... >>> >>> Thanks. >> >> Sorry for delay in response. >> I am OK with new definition. Agree, makes compatible with old definitions. >> Thanks! > > Which new definition; the one in Dmitry's patch, or what I proposed > above? Note that from what I recall, Dmitry's patch doesn't solve the > problem. Nevermind, I see this patch has been modified to address my concerns, and already applied. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
