Re: [PATCH v8 1/3] Input: cyttsp - Cypress TTSP capacitive multi-touch screen support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Javier,

> Changes for v8:
>     Dmitry Torokhov (9):
>     - Fix use-after-free in cyttsp_release
>     - Remove ext() method from bus ops
>     - Move up into main touchscreen directory
>     - Rework Kconfig entries
>     - Guard PM methods with CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>     - Device does not belong in bus structure
>     - Set up bus type in input device
>     - Use unified structure for ts object
>     - Consolidate PM methods
> 
>     Javier Martinez Canillas (5):
>     - Add <linux/device.h> macro to cyttsp_core.h
>     - Soft reset returns negative on error, not 0
>     - Use CY_NUM_RETRY instead of CY_DELAY_MAX for retries
>     - Add suspended an on boolean to cyttsp core
>     - Rework PM functions

Looking a lot better now, thank you. Some tiny comments below.

> +static int ttsp_read_block_data(struct cyttsp *ts, u8 command,
> +	u8 length, void *buf)
> +{
> +	int retval = -1;
> +	int tries;
> +
> +	if (!buf || !length)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	for (tries = 0; tries < CY_NUM_RETRY && (retval < 0); tries++) {
> +		retval = ts->bus_ops->read(ts->dev, command, length, buf);
> +		if (retval)
> +			msleep(CY_DELAY_DFLT);
> +	}
> +
> +	return retval;
> +}

Still wondering why (retval > 0) is handled the same way as (retval < 0).

> +static int cyttsp_bl_app_valid(struct cyttsp *ts)
> +{
> +	int retval;
> +
> +	retval = cyttsp_load_bl_regs(ts);
> +
> +	if (retval < 0) {
> +		retval = -ENODEV;
> +		goto done;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (GET_BOOTLOADERMODE(ts->bl_data.bl_status)) {
> +		if (IS_VALID_APP(ts->bl_data.bl_status))
> +			return 0;
> +		else
> +			return -ENODEV;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (GET_HSTMODE(ts->bl_data.bl_file) == CY_OPERATE_MODE) {
> +		if (!(IS_OPERATIONAL_ERR(ts->bl_data.bl_status)))
> +			return 1;
> +		else
> +			return -ENODEV;
> +	}
> +
> +	retval = -ENODEV;
> +done:
> +	return retval;

The function seems to always return ENODEV, something to simplify?

> +static int cyttsp_set_sysinfo_mode(struct cyttsp *ts)
> +{
> +	int retval;
> +	int tries;
> +	u8 cmd = CY_SYSINFO_MODE;
> +
> +	memset(&(ts->sysinfo_data), 0, sizeof(struct cyttsp_sysinfo_data));
> +
> +	/* switch to sysinfo mode */
> +	retval = ttsp_write_block_data(ts, CY_REG_BASE, sizeof(cmd), &cmd);
> +	if (retval < 0)
> +		return retval;
> +
> +	/* read sysinfo registers */
> +	tries = 0;
> +	do {
> +		msleep(CY_DELAY_DFLT);
> +		retval = ttsp_read_block_data(ts, CY_REG_BASE,
> +			sizeof(ts->sysinfo_data), &ts->sysinfo_data);
> +	} while ((retval || (!ts->sysinfo_data.tts_verh &&
> +			     !ts->sysinfo_data.tts_verl)) &&
> +		 (tries++ < CY_NUM_RETRY));
> +
> +	if (tries >= CY_NUM_RETRY)
> +		return -EAGAIN;

The loop above seems to appear many times in the code. Something to
simplify?

Thanks,
Henrik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux