On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, Henrik Rydberg wrote: > > for-next since nearly a month. > > I'll let you do the reverts, because on my local trees, it was quite > > difficult (and I'm still on a 3.0.x, so I can not test against > > for-next) > > Ok, let's see how Jiri wants to play it, and I can prepare either a > rewind-and-patch or a revert-and-patch or a keep-and-patch set. As I have already flushed my initial 3.1 queue to Linus already, I'd like to ask you guys to send me a patch based on Linus' tree (or my 'upstream-fixes' branch, which is what I am going to be sending as fixes for 3.2 still). I will then make sure that it reaches Linus before 3.2 has been released. > > Please add here the link to > > http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/device/input/DigitizerDrvs_touch.mspx > > to keep the origin of this statement: ContactID means multitouch > > Thanks, I will also make sure authorship is preserved where appropriate. Thanks a lot to both of you, and also an excellent bugreport by Sean. -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
