Re: [Q] max11801 licensing terms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Dmitry,

I've send a patch to mail list.

Thanks.

Best regards,
Zhang Jiejing



2011/8/18 Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 09:24:32PM +0800, Jiejing.Zhang  wrote:
>> Hi Brian Foster,
>>
>> >     * Based on mcs5000_ts.c
>> I have referenced mcs5000_ts.c source code when writing this driver,
>> but I don't think it's a big deal, I really reference lots of files.
>>
>> >  What does “either version 2 of the License.” mean?
>> >  Either GPLv2 or what?
>>
>> Yes, I think it means GPLv2, I'm not really not very care about these
>> license, just copy other files under driver/input/ directory.
>
> mcs5000_ts.c (and m97xx-core.c it was derived from) are GPLv2 or later
> so max11801_ts.c shoudl folow the same licensing terms, but it seems the
> statement was truncated.
>
> Jiejing, could you please send me a patch restoring the proper wording
> so there won't be any confusion in the future?
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Dmitry
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux