Re: [Q] max11801 licensing terms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 09:24:32PM +0800, Jiejing.Zhang  wrote:
> Hi Brian Foster,
> 
> >     * Based on mcs5000_ts.c
> I have referenced mcs5000_ts.c source code when writing this driver,
> but I don't think it's a big deal, I really reference lots of files.
> 
> >  What does “either version 2 of the License.” mean?
> >  Either GPLv2 or what?
> 
> Yes, I think it means GPLv2, I'm not really not very care about these
> license, just copy other files under driver/input/ directory.

mcs5000_ts.c (and m97xx-core.c it was derived from) are GPLv2 or later
so max11801_ts.c shoudl folow the same licensing terms, but it seems the
statement was truncated.

Jiejing, could you please send me a patch restoring the proper wording
so there won't be any confusion in the future?

Thanks!

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux