On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:36:04AM -0700, Christopher Heiny wrote:
> On 03/30/2011 01:02 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >* PGP Signed by an unknown key: 03/30/2011 at 12:02:23 AM
> >Hi,
> >
> >>+ retval = rmi_register_sensor(&instancedata->rmiphysdrvr, platformdata->perfunctiondata);
> >>+ if (retval) {
> >>+ dev_err(&client->dev, "%s: Failed to Register %s sensor drivers\n",
> >>+ __func__, instancedata->rmiphysdrvr.name);
> >>+ i2c_set_clientdata(client, NULL);
> >
> >I originally just wanted to say that this line can be removed. Then I
> >remembered that I already sent a patch for a similar driver in staging
> >(dc7b202a4ee6cb686e2bbef80c84443f43ec91bd). The staging driver looks in
> >a better shape to me. Do you know about it?
>
> That call is required in order to register the sensor device on the
I meant the last line, setting clientdata to NULL is not needed anymore.
> I'm afraid I can't locate the commit you specified.
Direct search failed for me, too, but here is the link:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=dc7b202a4ee6cb686e2bbef80c84443f43ec91bd
> I do find a driver in staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.[ch] - is that the
> one?
Yes, I meant this one. Looks a bit better from a glimpse; no '#if 0'-blocks,
much less printk. I just wondered how these two are related and if it makes
sense to join efforts here.
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
