Re: [PATCH 5/5] Add chip I2C addresses to header file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 10:37:43AM +0200, Iiro Valkonen wrote:
> On 02/03/2011 04:49 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 04:13:09PM +0200, Iiro Valkonen wrote:
> >> From: Iiro Valkonen <iiro.valkonen@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Add chip I2C addresses to header file.
> > 
> > Why do this?
> 
> To help lazy developers, they don't have to dig up the datasheet to
> see what address their chip is at? Well, I guess they might have to do
> that anyway to see what address out of these is selected with the
> address select pin. I thought it would be neat to have all the
> possible addresses listed here, and the developer could pick the
> correct one for his/her board file. Or in the case where he is not
> sure about the state of the address select pin, maybe even try them
> all. 
> 
> It does seem to be common practice to have the plain address in the
> board file without any defines in the header, so maybe this patch is
> not needed.

The headers should carry exported information. I have no problem with
adding register definitions, but data that is not needed for users
should go in .c file.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Linux Omap]

  Powered by Linux