On 02/03/11 13:00, Poddar, Sourav wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Igor Grinberg <grinberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> if (pdata->get_pendown_state) {
>> ts->get_pendown_state = pdata->get_pendown_state;
>> ts->gpio_pendown = -1;
>> return 0;
>> }
> Yes we can do so .I initialise it at a place where other variables
> where initialised.
>
>>> Also, why don't we use -EINVAL for the invalid gpio number instead of -1 constant?
>>>
> I used -1 because conditional check done in probe ads7846_probe function
> used this value.
>
> err_free_gpio:
> if (ts->gpio_pendown != -1)
> gpio_free(ts->gpio_pendown);
>
Well I understand that and that's why in my proposal I used -1 also, but
I thought we can make it even better if we switch to -EINVAL
(though wanted to check if there are any reasonable objections)
and while you are at this, may be you are willing also to submit a patch for this?
--
Regards,
Igor.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
