On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 08:59:39PM -0800, Ping Cheng wrote: > On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Dmitry Torokhov > <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 10:25:20AM -0800, Ping Cheng wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Ping Cheng <pinglinux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > Dmitry, > >> > > >> > Thank you for your effort in updating the patch. Most changes work for > >> > me. I do have comments related to raw touch data scaling for MT and > >> > single touch legacy client support. Details are inline. > >> > >> After revisited the change you made, I think I can accept both > >> suggestions. The legacy client support may introduce issue. But it > >> won't hurt too much, I hope ;). The MT scaling offers a consistent > >> support between one and two finger touch, which is good. > >> > >> So, the only change left is to scale the raw x,y of 2FGT to max_pen. I > >> can make a version 3 of this patch for you or you can change those two > >> lines if you don't mind. Just let me know. > > > > If there are such devices that have pen + 2FGT then please adjust the > > patch as you should be able to test it ;) > > Yes, there are pen + 2FGT devices in the market now. Will update the patch soon. > > > Also, if you [re]send me inputattach part for 8001 I shoudl try adding > > it to inputattach (it's not there yet, is it?). > > No, inputattach is not part of this patchset. I am not sure which > inputattach.c source my patch should be based on. The one under your > repo looks a bit old.... > The one on the sourceforge should be recent. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html