Hi Arce, On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 12:45:45AM -0500, Arce, Abraham wrote: > Hi Naveen, Dmitry, > > > From: Naveen Kumar GADDIPATI [mailto:naveen.gaddipati@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > > > Hi Arce, > > > > I'm also the GPIO pin for interrupt with request threaded irq . > > I'm passing the irq_type from the platform data. > > Which irq_type are you using for your platform? > > > > I am using the following flags > > IRQF_DISABLED | IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW | IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING > > Should I get rid of the first one, IRQF_DISABLED? > > IRQF_DISABLED - keep irqs disabled when calling the action handler > You probably want IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW | IRQF_ONESHOT if your interrupt is level tiggered. IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW | IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING mixes edge and level options and thus I don't think is proper. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
