On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:58:38PM +0530, Trilok Soni wrote: > Hi Dmitry, William, > > On 9/14/2010 6:20 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > Hi William, > > > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 05:26:15PM -0700, William Manson wrote: > >> Hi Abraham - > >> > >> Yes - the TM1217 is an RMI4 based module [I just got an email from a > >> f/w engineer confirming it is indeed RMI4]. > >> > >> We are currently working on submitting a new patch for our RMI4 based > >> driver to add some functionality based on Dmitry Torokhov's request > >> that we implement an RMI bus architecture. This is kind of a large > >> change and we had hoped our current submission for our RMI4 driver > >> would be added to the Kernel.org under a branch where every developer > >> could access it and then we could add in the RMI bus architecture in a > >> later patch. So it will take a while till we can make a new patch but > >> I have no problem if you want to try the existing patch out. > > > > I have committed the latest version of the patch Christopher sent (sans > > defconfig and gta01 platform changes that do not really belong there) to > > synaptics-rmi4 branch of my tree on kernel.org. I branched it off 2.6.35 > > release so it should be reasonably usable. > > Why don't you submit to drivers/staging instead of creating branch at Dmitry's GIT tree? > > You can probably attract more developers and you don't need to rebase to latest kernel > everytime. > Since it is an input driver it is easier for me to apply patches to my tree instead of routing through Greg. I intend to keep that ranch at 2.6.35 unless we have to rebase. Thanks. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
