Hi Dmitry, William, On 9/14/2010 6:20 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Hi William, > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 05:26:15PM -0700, William Manson wrote: >> Hi Abraham - >> >> Yes - the TM1217 is an RMI4 based module [I just got an email from a >> f/w engineer confirming it is indeed RMI4]. >> >> We are currently working on submitting a new patch for our RMI4 based >> driver to add some functionality based on Dmitry Torokhov's request >> that we implement an RMI bus architecture. This is kind of a large >> change and we had hoped our current submission for our RMI4 driver >> would be added to the Kernel.org under a branch where every developer >> could access it and then we could add in the RMI bus architecture in a >> later patch. So it will take a while till we can make a new patch but >> I have no problem if you want to try the existing patch out. > > I have committed the latest version of the patch Christopher sent (sans > defconfig and gta01 platform changes that do not really belong there) to > synaptics-rmi4 branch of my tree on kernel.org. I branched it off 2.6.35 > release so it should be reasonably usable. Why don't you submit to drivers/staging instead of creating branch at Dmitry's GIT tree? You can probably attract more developers and you don't need to rebase to latest kernel everytime. ---Trilok Soni -- Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
