On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 00:26 -0400, Michael Poole wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 13:20 -0400, Chase Douglas wrote:
> > The trackpad speaks a similar, but different, protocol from the magic
> > mouse. However, only small code tweaks here and there are needed to make
> > basic multitouch work.
> >
> > Extra logic is required for single-touch emulation of the touchpad. The
> > changes made here take the approach that only one finger may emulate the
> > single pointer when multiple fingers have touched the screen. Once that
> > finger is raised, all touches must be raised before any further single
> > touch events can be sent.
> >
> > Sometimes the magic trackpad sends two distinct touch reports as one big
> > report. Simply splitting the packet in two and resending them through
> > magicmouse_raw_event ensures they are handled properly.
> >
> > I also added myself to the copyright statement.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I have no technical concerns with the patch, just two questions. (Once
> I get the chance to test it, I expect to add my Acked-by.)
<snip>
> > - if (report_touches) {
> > - last_up = 1;
> > - for (ii = 0; ii < ARRAY_SIZE(msc->touches); ii++) {
> > - if (msc->touches[ii].down) {
> > - last_up = 0;
> > - msc->touches[ii].down = 0;
> > - }
> > - }
> > - if (last_up) {
> > - input_mt_sync(input);
> > - }
> > - }
> > -
>
> Maybe it is worth making magicmouse_emit_touch() return non-zero if the
> touch is down, so that "last_up" can be accumulated in a single pass
> (and we can remove the "down" field of the touch)? I think that should
> be a separate commit, if the idea makes sense to you.
That makes sense to me without diving into the code. I don't really have
the time to work on it right now though, so is it ok if these patches
are applied first?
<snip>
> > @@ -388,12 +473,29 @@ static struct feature mouse_features[] = {
> > { { 0xf8, 0x01, 0x32 }, 3 }
> > };
> >
> > +static struct feature trackpad_features[] = {
> > + { { 0xf1, 0xdb }, 2 },
> > + { { 0xf1, 0xdc }, 2 },
> > + { { 0xf0, 0x00 }, 2 },
> > + { { 0xf1, 0xdd }, 2 },
> > + { { 0xf0, 0x02 }, 2 },
> > + { { 0xf1, 0xc8 }, 2 },
> > + { { 0xf0, 0x09 }, 2 },
> > + { { 0xf1, 0xdc }, 2 },
> > + { { 0xf0, 0x00 }, 2 },
> > + { { 0xf1, 0xdd }, 2 },
> > + { { 0xf0, 0x02 }, 2 },
> > + { { 0xd7, 0x01 }, 2 },
> > +};
> > +
>
> As I mentioned in another email, only the last entry here is required to
> turn on multitouch reports. Do you know what the other entries do?
No clue. I just copied what OS X was sending to the device. It works for
myself and others, so I haven't messed with it.
Thanks,
-- Chase
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
