On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 05:23:09PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > > sorry for the late reply on this, I guess I haven't been much help > around here lately. > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 01:30:48AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > The approach is pretty solid, with the exception that I do not think > > we'd save much if we allocate every axis data separately (as I mentioned > > in one of my earlier mails). > > Agreed. We at least save the memory for all input devices that don't > have absolute axis at all. > > > Coudl you please take a look at the following patches and let me know if > > you see something wrong. > > I checked the patches and tried them locally on my desktop, and I can't > see any breakage, but we might need more coverage for testing. > > Will you push them to the .36 merge window or is it too late for this? > Yep, it in mainline now. Thank you for working on this. - Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
