Em 28-07-2010 14:38, Jon Smirl escreveu: > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Andy Walls <awalls@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 13:04 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab >>> <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Em 28-07-2010 11:41, Jon Smirl escreveu: >> >>> >>> Are there any IR protocols less than 20 (or 17) years old? If they are >>> older than that the patents have expired. I expect IR use to decline >>> in the future, it will be replaced with RF4CE radio remotes. >> >> UEI's XMP protocol for one, IIRC. > > The beauty of LIRC is that you can use any remote for input. If one > remote's protocols are patented, just use another remote. > > Only in the case where we have to xmit the protocol is the patent > conflict unavoidable. In that case we could resort to sending a raw > pulse timing string that comes from user space. Well, software patents are valid only on very few Countries. People that live on a software-patent-free Country can keep using those protocols, if they can just upload a set of rules for a generic driver. On the other hand, a rule-hardcoded codec for a patented protocol cannot be inside Kernel, as this would restrict kernel distribution on those non-software-patent-free Countries. Cheers, Mauro. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
