On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > > > +With 0x05ac being the vendor ID (Apple, you shouldn't need to change this) > > > > > +With 0x8242 being the product ID (check the output of lsusb for your hardware) > > > > > +And 0x08 being "HID_CONNECT_HIDDEV" > > > > > > > > I am afraid this is not true, 0x08 is HID_QUIRK_NOGET. > > > > > > > > We currently don't have dynamic quirk for forcing HIDDEV creation from the > > > > module parameter. > > > > > > Right. Any chance to change that? > > > > This particular one might actually make enough sense to be added (although > > I am really trying to avoid quirk additions completely), for backwards > > compatibility reasons. > > Should I remove the comments there altogether then? That kind of defeats > my "but you can use lirc with some tweaks" argument, even though I still > think that those people needing more keys would be in the minority... I rather though that we could/should (re-)introduce the HID_QUIRK_HIDDEV quirks so that it could still be applied manually. Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
