On Friday 10 July 2009 01:55:27 am David Härdeman wrote: > On Thu, July 9, 2009 23:38, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > Here are two sample patches to show you what I was suggesting. These > > apply on top of the two Winbond patches currently in -mm. > > Thanks, great service :) > > I'll test the patches as soon as I have time and access to the hardware. > > One question though, the resulting patch series (if AKPM merges these > patches in addition to the existing ones and drops the patch adding > .shutdown to acpi_driver) will be git bisect unfriendly. > > Should I roll two new patches instead to replace the three patches > currently in -mm? If you like the approach and it works, I would take the latter approach (replace the three patches with two new ones -- e.g., add-pnp-shutdown-method and add-winbond-pnp-driver). I don't think we have to worry about bisectability until they show up in a git tree. Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
