Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Thu, 20 Nov 2008, Henrik Rydberg wrote: > >>> Therefore my memory must have been wrong -- I thought that you told me >>> when I was merging f89bd95c5c that the devices are not standard HID >>> devices at all, and therefore they can be safely ignored by the driver >>> right away, as they can't be driven by HID driver anyway. >> These usb devices provide several different functions through the same >> interface. By default, it looks like a regular mouse interface, which >> HID will claim. This is why we need the quirks. > > That I fully understand. But I though that the device is so much HID > standard non-compliant, that even basic functionality is not possible with > the generic HID driver, and therefore blacklisting it immediately can't do > any harm. That's what I understood previously. But if this is wrong, and > the HID code can get at least basic functionality from the device, I will > revert the blacklist addition. Basic functionality is possible with the generic HID driver. Thanks, Henrik -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
