On Thu, 20 Nov 2008, Henrik Rydberg wrote: > > Therefore my memory must have been wrong -- I thought that you told me > > when I was merging f89bd95c5c that the devices are not standard HID > > devices at all, and therefore they can be safely ignored by the driver > > right away, as they can't be driven by HID driver anyway. > These usb devices provide several different functions through the same > interface. By default, it looks like a regular mouse interface, which > HID will claim. This is why we need the quirks. That I fully understand. But I though that the device is so much HID standard non-compliant, that even basic functionality is not possible with the generic HID driver, and therefore blacklisting it immediately can't do any harm. That's what I understood previously. But if this is wrong, and the HID code can get at least basic functionality from the device, I will revert the blacklist addition. Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
