On 02/06/2012 03:53 PM, Cong Wang wrote: > On 02/06/2012 03:51 PM, Dave Young wrote: >> I think the key problem is the network setup code split. I would not >> insist on this although I don't like that we must add ip= to have >> network setup > > With your patches, we must have rd.neednet=1. :) So, it is unfair to > only blame ip= approach. I mean for netroot we also must have ip= set because ip= will deal with the network setup. Originally we might have no ip= but with proper netroot param like root=nfs... > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Thanks Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
