On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 11:28:07AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > Any objection to replace "libexec" with "lib"? > > According to LSB/FHS, applications are required to use a named > directory in /usr/lib/: > http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#USRLIBLIBRARIESFORPROGRAMMINGANDPA > Some distros, like e.g. SUSE, don't allow packages to use libexec at all. > > Would be nice, if we could do something like: > sed -i 's#/usr/libexec/dracut#/usr/lib/dracut#' Makefile dracut dracut.spec I'm not against this change. This a particularly egregious redhat-ism that is guaranteed to break pretty much everywhere else. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
