Re: [PATCH][next] iio: cros_ec: Avoid -Wflex-array-member-not-at-end warning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 15:10:38 +1030
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 17/03/25 12:02, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 11:24:59AM +1030, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:  
> >>   static int cros_ec_get_host_cmd_version_mask(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev,
> >>   					     u16 cmd_offset, u16 cmd, u32 *mask)
> >>   {
> >> +	DEFINE_RAW_FLEX(struct cros_ec_command, buf, data,
> >> +			sizeof(struct ec_response_get_cmd_versions));  
> > 
> > max(sizeof(struct ec_params_get_cmd_versions),
> >      sizeof(struct ec_response_get_cmd_versions))?  
> 
> I considered that, but DEFINE_RAW_FLEX() complains about it due to the
> 
> _Static_assert(__builtin_constant_p(count),				\
> 		       "onstack flex array members require compile-time const count");
> 
Maybe add an assert that you indeed have the larger of the two + a comment
on why it matters?

> --
> Gustavo
> 





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux