On 1/7/25 11:44 AM, Marcelo Schmitt wrote:
> On 01/07, David Lechner wrote:
>> On 1/7/25 9:11 AM, Marcelo Schmitt wrote:
>>> Better document sysfs ABI for ADC digital filter configuration.
>>>
>>> Change log v1 -> v2
>>> - Split into 3 patches.
>>> - Re-added sysfs-bus-iio-adc-ad4130 to keep filter_mode separate from filter_type.
>>
>> If ad7779 is the only driver with filter_type{,available} attributes while
>> ad4130 and admv8818 both have filter_mode{,available} attributes, shouldn't we
>> be deprecating filter_type and promoting filter_mode?
>
> Oh, I had only grepped the adc dir and I didn't noticed admv8818 also had
> filter_mode.
> Hmm, don't know, though still biased towards filter_type.
>
> - The admv8818 filter_mode_available ABI exports different values (auto,
> manual, bypass).
Ah, I didn't look that far, so yes, I agree this is a good reason to standardize
on filter_type instead.
> - AD7768-1, ADAQ7768-1, AD7768/AD7768-4, AD7124-4, and AD4170 datasheets
> refer to sinc filters as filter types (though not all of those designs are
> supported in IIO or have filter attributes).
> - The AD4130 datasheets also refers to the digital filter as filter type in
> some occasions.
>
> But some datasheets seem to use filter mode and filter type interchangeably
> so I don't know. The admv8818 use case is valid and is both low and high-pass
> filtering while the ADCs sinc digital filters act like low-pass filter.
> Maybe even provide a different name for ADC digital filtering?
> digital_filter_type (or digital_filter_mode)?.
>
> Thanks for pointing that out.
