From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> This complex cleanup.h use case of conditional guards has proved to be more trouble that it is worth in terms of false positive compiler warnings and hard to read code. Move directly to the new claim/release_direct() that allow sparse to check for unbalanced context. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/iio/proximity/sx9310.c | 19 +++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9310.c b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9310.c index 0d7f0518d4fb..b60707eba39d 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9310.c +++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9310.c @@ -337,19 +337,26 @@ static int sx9310_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, int *val2, long mask) { struct sx_common_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev); + int ret; if (chan->type != IIO_PROXIMITY) return -EINVAL; switch (mask) { case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW: - iio_device_claim_direct_scoped(return -EBUSY, indio_dev) - return sx_common_read_proximity(data, chan, val); - unreachable(); + if (!iio_device_claim_direct(indio_dev)) + return -EBUSY; + + ret = sx_common_read_proximity(data, chan, val); + iio_device_release_direct(indio_dev); + return ret; case IIO_CHAN_INFO_HARDWAREGAIN: - iio_device_claim_direct_scoped(return -EBUSY, indio_dev) - return sx9310_read_gain(data, chan, val); - unreachable(); + if (!iio_device_claim_direct(indio_dev)) + return -EBUSY; + + ret = sx9310_read_gain(data, chan, val); + iio_device_release_direct(indio_dev); + return ret; case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ: return sx9310_read_samp_freq(data, val, val2); default: -- 2.47.1