On 20/12/2024 21:21, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On Mon, 16 Dec 2024 10:56:37 +0200 Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Make available scale building more clear. This hurts the performance quite a bit by looping throgh the scales many times instead of doing everything in one loop. It however simplifies logic by: - decoupling the gain and scale allocations & computations - keeping the temporary 'per_time_gains' table inside the per_time_scales computation function. - separating building the 'all scales' table in own function and doing it based on the already computed per-time scales. Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@xxxxxxxxx>Looks good to me, but I want to leave it on list a while before applying. Ideal if it gets some tested-by or other tags before I pick it up. As always, this is fiddly code, so the more eyes the better!
Please, let it wait until the Christmas has passed. I got information we might be getting some testing before the year changes :)
Yours, -- Matti
