On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 10:18:31 +0000
Guillaume Stols <gstols@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Adds the logic for effectively enabling the software mode for the
> iio-backend, i.e enabling the software mode channel configuration and
> implementing the register writing functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Stols <gstols@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
A few comments inline, but basically looks fine to me.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7606_par.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7606_par.c
> index a25182a3daa7..0c1177f436f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7606_par.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7606_par.c
> static int ad7606_bi_update_scan_mode(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, const unsigned long *scan_mask)
> {
> struct ad7606_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> @@ -70,7 +83,7 @@ static int ad7606_bi_setup_iio_backend(struct device *dev, struct iio_dev *indio
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - ret = devm_iio_backend_enable(dev, st->back);
> + ret = devm_iio_backend_enable(st->dev, st->back);
Is that a different dev? That's not obvious...
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -86,9 +99,52 @@ static int ad7606_bi_setup_iio_backend(struct device *dev, struct iio_dev *indio
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int ad7606_bi_reg_read(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, unsigned int addr)
> +{
> + struct ad7606_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + int val, ret;
> + struct ad7606_platform_data *pdata = st->dev->platform_data;
> +
> + iio_device_claim_direct_scoped(return -EBUSY, indio_dev) {
> + ret = pdata->bus_reg_read(st->back,
> + addr,
> + &val);
As below.
> + }
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return val;
> +}
> +
> +static int ad7606_bi_reg_write(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> + unsigned int addr,
> + unsigned int val)
> +{
> + struct ad7606_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> + struct ad7606_platform_data *pdata = st->dev->platform_data;
> + int ret;
> +
> + iio_device_claim_direct_scoped(return -EBUSY, indio_dev) {
Given David's if_not_cond_guard() should land shortly I'd prefer
to use that going forwards for cases like this.
> + ret = pdata->bus_reg_write(st->back,
> + addr,
> + val);
Put parameters all on one line.
+ return here (which needs the new if_not_cond_guard() to avoid
confusing the compiler).
> + }
> + return ret;
> +}
