On Sat, Nov 23, 2024 at 03:26:37PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 16:38:58 -0500 > Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Use devm_* and dev_err_probe() simplify probe function and remove > > vf610_adc_remove(). > > > > Reviewed-by: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@xxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx> > Hi Frank, > > One (hopefully final) question inline. > > Jonathan > > > --- > > Change from v3 to v4 > > - keep vref_uv as u32 > > - keep original regulator part and only add > > devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev, vf610_adc_remove, info) > > > > Change from v2 to v3 > > - change vref_uv to int from u32 to fix below warning > > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> > > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411070633.NIrO7Ert-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/ > > smatch warnings: > > drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c:857 vf610_adc_probe() warn: unsigned 'info->vref_uv' is never less than zero. > > > > vim +857 drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c > > > > Change from v1 to v2 > > - add Haibo's review tag > > --- > > drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c | 79 ++++++++++++------------------------- > > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c > > index 4d83c12975c53..d4b778799755b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c > > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.c > > @@ -814,6 +814,14 @@ static const struct of_device_id vf610_adc_match[] = { > > }; > > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, vf610_adc_match); > > > > +static void vf610_adc_action_remove(void *d) > > +{ > > + struct vf610_adc *info = d; > > + > > + if (info->vref) > > + regulator_disable(info->vref); > > Why is the check on info->vref needed? > vref is required to reach the point where this callback is registered. > > > +} > > + > > static int vf610_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > { > > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > > @@ -823,10 +831,8 @@ static int vf610_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > int ret; > > > > indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct vf610_adc)); > > - if (!indio_dev) { > > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed allocating iio device\n"); > > - return -ENOMEM; > > - } > > + if (!indio_dev) > > + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, -ENOMEM, "Failed allocating iio device\n"); > > > > info = iio_priv(indio_dev); > > info->dev = &pdev->dev; > > @@ -842,17 +848,12 @@ static int vf610_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > ret = devm_request_irq(info->dev, irq, > > vf610_adc_isr, 0, > > dev_name(&pdev->dev), indio_dev); > > - if (ret < 0) { > > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed requesting irq, irq = %d\n", irq); > > - return ret; > > - } > > + if (ret < 0) > > + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "failed requesting irq, irq = %d\n", irq); > > > > - info->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "adc"); > > - if (IS_ERR(info->clk)) { > > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed getting clock, err = %ld\n", > > - PTR_ERR(info->clk)); > > - return PTR_ERR(info->clk); > > - } > > + info->clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(&pdev->dev, "adc"); > > + if (IS_ERR(info->clk)) > > + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(info->clk), "failed getting clock\n"); > > > > info->vref = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "vref"); > > if (IS_ERR(info->vref)) > > @@ -862,6 +863,10 @@ static int vf610_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > if (ret) > > return ret; > > > > + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev, vf610_adc_action_remove, info); > > As above, but this time if info->vref is not set, we have already returned so it > must be set and doesn't need checking the callback. Yes, you are right. Needn't check it at callback. Frank > > > + if (ret) > > + return ret; > > + > > info->vref_uv = regulator_get_voltage(info->vref); > > > > device_property_read_u32_array(dev, "fsl,adck-max-frequency", info->max_adck_rate, 3); > > @@ -879,52 +884,21 @@ static int vf610_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > indio_dev->channels = vf610_adc_iio_channels; > > indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(vf610_adc_iio_channels); > > > > - ret = clk_prepare_enable(info->clk); > > - if (ret) { > > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, > > - "Could not prepare or enable the clock.\n"); > > - goto error_adc_clk_enable; > > - } > > - > > vf610_adc_cfg_init(info); > > vf610_adc_hw_init(info); > > > > - ret = iio_triggered_buffer_setup(indio_dev, &iio_pollfunc_store_time, > > - NULL, &iio_triggered_buffer_setup_ops); > > - if (ret < 0) { > > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Couldn't initialise the buffer\n"); > > - goto error_iio_device_register; > > - } > > + ret = devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup(&pdev->dev, indio_dev, &iio_pollfunc_store_time, > > + NULL, &iio_triggered_buffer_setup_ops); > > + if (ret < 0) > > + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "Couldn't initialise the buffer\n"); > > > > mutex_init(&info->lock); > > > > - ret = iio_device_register(indio_dev); > > - if (ret) { > > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Couldn't register the device.\n"); > > - goto error_adc_buffer_init; > > - } > > + ret = devm_iio_device_register(&pdev->dev, indio_dev); > > + if (ret) > > + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "Couldn't register the device.\n"); > > > > return 0; > > - > > -error_adc_buffer_init: > > - iio_triggered_buffer_cleanup(indio_dev); > > -error_iio_device_register: > > - clk_disable_unprepare(info->clk); > > -error_adc_clk_enable: > > - regulator_disable(info->vref); > > - > > - return ret; > > -} > > - > > -static void vf610_adc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > > -{ > > - struct iio_dev *indio_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > > - struct vf610_adc *info = iio_priv(indio_dev); > > - > > - iio_device_unregister(indio_dev); > > - iio_triggered_buffer_cleanup(indio_dev); > > - regulator_disable(info->vref); > > - clk_disable_unprepare(info->clk); > > } > > > > static int vf610_adc_suspend(struct device *dev) > > @@ -972,7 +946,6 @@ static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(vf610_adc_pm_ops, vf610_adc_suspend, > > > > static struct platform_driver vf610_adc_driver = { > > .probe = vf610_adc_probe, > > - .remove = vf610_adc_remove, > > .driver = { > > .name = DRIVER_NAME, > > .of_match_table = vf610_adc_match, >