On 11/25/24 2:59 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello, > > first of all thanks for picking up my report. > > $Subject ~= s/ad7313/ad7173/ > > I wonder if it would make sense to update the ad7173 binding to also > allow specifying the irq as the other ADCs do it and just > unconditionally fall back to rdy-interrupt (or the other way round)? > There is no good reason for ad7173 being special, is there? > > Best regards > Uwe That is a a good point. We actually don't have to change the DT bindings, the "rdy" interrupt is already specified to be the first interrupt, so spi->irq should already be the "rdy" interrupt because is is always getting the interrupt at index 0. So we should be able to just drop the special handling altogether.
