On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 18:26:44 +0000
Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Add a function to empty the FIFO and reset the INT_SOURCE register.
> Reading out is used to reset the fifo again. For cleanup also a read
> on the INT_SOURCE register is needed to allow the adxl345 to issue
> interrupts again. Without clearing the fields no further interrupts
> will happen.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/iio/accel/adxl345_core.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/adxl345_core.c b/drivers/iio/accel/adxl345_core.c
> index 40e78dbdb0..82bd5c2b78 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/adxl345_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/adxl345_core.c
> @@ -356,6 +356,61 @@ static int adxl345_get_fifo_entries(struct adxl34x_state *st, int *fifo_entries)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * adxl345_read_fifo_elements() - Read fifo_entries number of elements.
> + * @st: The instance of the state object of this sensor.
> + * @fifo_entries: The number of lines in the FIFO referred to as fifo_entry,
> + * a fifo_entry has 3 elements for X, Y and Z direction of 2 bytes each.
> + *
> + * The FIFO of the sensor is read linewise. The read measurement values are
> + * queued in the corresponding data structure in *st.
> + *
> + * It is recommended that a multiple-byte read of all registers be performed to
> + * prevent a change in data between reads of sequential registers. That is to
> + * read out the data registers X0, X1, Y0, Y1, Z0, Z1 at once.
To ensure this, set avail_scan_modes.
Then if the user requests a subset, the IIO core code will extract what is necessary
from the read of everythign.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 or error value.
> + */
> +static int adxl345_read_fifo_elements(struct adxl34x_state *st, int fifo_entries)
> +{
> + size_t count, ndirs = 3;
> + int i, ret;
> +
> + count = 2 * ndirs; /* 2 byte per direction */
sizeof(st->fifo_buf[0] * ndirs);
> + for (i = 0; i < fifo_entries; i++) {
> + ret = regmap_noinc_read(st->regmap, ADXL345_REG_XYZ_BASE,
> + st->fifo_buf + (i * count / 2), count);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_warn("%s(): regmap_noinc_read() failed\n", __func__);
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * adxl345_empty_fifo() - Empty the FIFO.
> + * @st: The instance to the state object of the sensor.
> + *
> + * Reading all elements of the FIFO linewise empties the FIFO. Reading th
> + * interrupt source register resets the sensor. This is needed also in case of
> + * overflow or error handling to reenable the sensor to issue interrupts.
> + */
> +static void adxl345_empty_fifo(struct adxl34x_state *st)
> +{
> + int regval;
> + int fifo_entries;
> +
> + /* In case the HW is not "clean" just read out remaining elements */
> + adxl345_get_fifo_entries(st, &fifo_entries);
> + if (fifo_entries > 0)
> + adxl345_read_fifo_elements(st, fifo_entries);
> +
> + /* Reset the INT_SOURCE register by reading the register */
> + regmap_read(st->regmap, ADXL345_REG_INT_SOURCE, ®val);
> +}
> +
> static const struct iio_buffer_setup_ops adxl345_buffer_ops = {
> };
>
> @@ -401,30 +456,34 @@ static irqreturn_t adxl345_trigger_handler(int irq, void *p)
>
> ret = adxl345_get_status(st, &int_stat);
> if (ret < 0)
> - goto done;
> + goto err;
All this churn just makes things less readable. Better to have the bulk
of the addition of fifo handling in one patch. It won't be too large
for review.
>
> /* Ignore already read event by reissued too fast */
> if (int_stat == 0x0)
> - goto done;
> + goto err;
>
> /* evaluation */
>
> if (int_stat & ADXL345_INT_OVERRUN) {
> pr_debug("%s(): OVERRUN event detected\n", __func__);
> - goto done;
> + goto err;
> }
>
> if (int_stat & (ADXL345_INT_DATA_READY | ADXL345_INT_WATERMARK)) {
> pr_debug("%s(): WATERMARK or DATA_READY event detected\n", __func__);
> if (adxl345_get_fifo_entries(st, &fifo_entries) < 0)
> - goto done;
> - }
> - goto done;
> -done:
> + goto err;
>
> - if (indio_dev)
> iio_trigger_notify_done(indio_dev->trig);
> + }
>
> + goto done;
> +err:
> + iio_trigger_notify_done(indio_dev->trig);
> + adxl345_empty_fifo(st);
> + return IRQ_NONE;
NONE is probably a bad idea. Something went wrong but that doesn't
mean it wasn't our interrupt. In most cases it is better to just
return that we handled it. IRQ_NONE might be valid if the status
said it wasn't ours.
> +
> +done:
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
return where you have goto done and get rid of this.
> }
>
