On Sat, Nov 9, 2024 at 8:38 AM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 20:09:00 +0000
> Jiasheng Jiang <jiashengjiangcool@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Add check for the return value of clk_enable() in order to catch the
> > potential exception.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiashengjiangcool@xxxxxxxxx>
> Hi,
>
> In principle this is fine, but I'd rather we made use of guard()
> / scoped_guard() rather than adding the explicit unlocks.
>
> If you do that as a precursor patch in appropriate places
> in the driver then this will be a little cleaner.
>
> Note I'll not be taking this until next cycle now anyway.
>
> Jonathan
>
> > ---
> > Changelog:
> >
> > v1 -> v2:
> >
> > 1. Remove unsuitable dev_err_probe().
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/trigger/stm32-timer-trigger.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/trigger/stm32-timer-trigger.c b/drivers/iio/trigger/stm32-timer-trigger.c
> > index 0684329956d9..e1e077122f73 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/trigger/stm32-timer-trigger.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/trigger/stm32-timer-trigger.c
> > @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static int stm32_timer_start(struct stm32_timer_trigger *priv,
> > unsigned int frequency)
> > {
> > unsigned long long prd, div;
> > - int prescaler = 0;
> > + int prescaler = 0, ret;
> > u32 ccer;
> >
> > /* Period and prescaler values depends of clock rate */
> > @@ -153,7 +153,11 @@ static int stm32_timer_start(struct stm32_timer_trigger *priv,
> > mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
> > if (!priv->enabled) {
> > priv->enabled = true;
> > - clk_enable(priv->clk);
> > + ret = clk_enable(priv->clk);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
>
> as below guard() for when the mutex is locked is cleaner.
>
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > regmap_write(priv->regmap, TIM_PSC, prescaler);
> > @@ -307,7 +311,7 @@ static ssize_t stm32_tt_store_master_mode(struct device *dev,
> > struct stm32_timer_trigger *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > struct iio_trigger *trig = to_iio_trigger(dev);
> > u32 mask, shift, master_mode_max;
> > - int i;
> > + int i, ret;
> >
> > if (stm32_timer_is_trgo2_name(trig->name)) {
> > mask = TIM_CR2_MMS2;
> > @@ -326,7 +330,11 @@ static ssize_t stm32_tt_store_master_mode(struct device *dev,
> > if (!priv->enabled) {
> > /* Clock should be enabled first */
> > priv->enabled = true;
> > - clk_enable(priv->clk);
> > + ret = clk_enable(priv->clk);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
> As below. Prefer use of guard() so we don't have to handle the unlock manually.
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > }
> > regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, TIM_CR2, mask,
> > i << shift);
> > @@ -482,6 +490,7 @@ static int stm32_counter_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > int val, int val2, long mask)
> > {
> > struct stm32_timer_trigger *priv = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > + int ret;
> >
> > switch (mask) {
> > case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
> > @@ -496,7 +505,11 @@ static int stm32_counter_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > if (val) {
> > if (!priv->enabled) {
> > priv->enabled = true;
> > - clk_enable(priv->clk);
> > + ret = clk_enable(priv->clk);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
> Add include of cleanup.h and swithch the place where the mutex is locked to
> guard(mutex)(&priv->lock);
> then remember to drop the explicit unlocks.
I found that cleanup.h is already included.
Moreover, since labels cannot be followed by declarations,
I encountered a compilation error when using guard().
Therefore, I switched to using scoped_guard().
>
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > }
> > regmap_set_bits(priv->regmap, TIM_CR1, TIM_CR1_CEN);
> > } else {
> > @@ -601,7 +614,7 @@ static int stm32_set_enable_mode(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > unsigned int mode)
> > {
> > struct stm32_timer_trigger *priv = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > - int sms = stm32_enable_mode2sms(mode);
> > + int sms = stm32_enable_mode2sms(mode), ret;
> >
> > if (sms < 0)
> > return sms;
> > @@ -611,7 +624,12 @@ static int stm32_set_enable_mode(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > */
> > mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
>
> Perhaps scoped_guard() is appropriate here.
>
> > if (sms == 6 && !priv->enabled) {
> > - clk_enable(priv->clk);
> > + ret = clk_enable(priv->clk);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > priv->enabled = true;
> > }
> > mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
>
Thanks, I will submit a v2 to simplify code with cleanup helpers.
-Jiasheng
