Re: [bug report] iio: chemical: bme680: generalize read_*() functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 10:58:01AM +0100, Vasileios Amoiridis wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 12:26:13PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > Hello Vasileios Amoiridis,

Adding also Jonathan in the thread.
> > 
> > Commit 9b4071ab8cbe ("iio: chemical: bme680: generalize read_*()
> > functions") from Oct 21, 2024 (linux-next), leads to the following
> > Smatch static checker warning:
> > 
> > 	drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_core.c:760 bme680_read_raw()
> > 	warn: passing casted pointer '&chan_val' to 'bme680_read_temp()' 32 vs 16.
> > 
> > drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_core.c
> >     738 static int bme680_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> >     739                            struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> >     740                            int *val, int *val2, long mask)
> >     741 {
> >     742         struct bme680_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> >     743         int chan_val, ret;
> >     744 
> >     745         guard(mutex)(&data->lock);
> >     746 
> >     747         /* set forced mode to trigger measurement */
> >     748         ret = bme680_set_mode(data, true);
> >     749         if (ret < 0)
> >     750                 return ret;
> >     751 
> >     752         ret = bme680_wait_for_eoc(data);
> >     753         if (ret)
> >     754                 return ret;
> >     755 
> >     756         switch (mask) {
> >     757         case IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED:
> >     758                 switch (chan->type) {
> >     759                 case IIO_TEMP:
> > --> 760                         ret = bme680_read_temp(data, (s16 *)&chan_val);
> > 
> > The bme680_read_temp() function takes an s16 pointer but we're passing a s32.
> > This will not work on big endian systems and even on little endian systems, we
> > haven't initialized the last 16 bits of chan_val so it's an uninitialized
> > variable bug.
> > 
> 
> Hi Dan,
> 
> Thanks for letting me know! What I could do is instead of reusing the
> int chan_val, I could use a local s16 temp_chan_val so there is no need
> for typecasting here. How does that sound to you Jonathan?
> 
> Cheers,
> Vasilis
> 
> >     761                         if (ret)
> >     762                                 return ret;
> >     763 
> >     764                         *val = chan_val * 10;
> >     765                         return IIO_VAL_INT;
> > 
> > regards,
> > dan carpenter




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux