On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 22:05:11 +0300 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The commits in question do not proove that ACPI IDs exist. > Quite likely it was a cargo cult addition while doing that > for DT-based enumeration. Drop most likely fake ACPI IDs. > > The to be removed IDs has been checked against the following resources: > 1) DuckDuckGo > 2) Google > 3) MS catalog: https://www.catalog.update.microsoft.com/Search.aspx > This gives no useful results in regard to DSDT, moreover, the official > vendor ID in the registry for Lite-On is LCI. > > Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Applied. > --- > drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c b/drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c > index 8c516ede9116..3fff5d58ba3c 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/light/ltr501.c > @@ -1610,8 +1610,6 @@ static int ltr501_resume(struct device *dev) > static DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(ltr501_pm_ops, ltr501_suspend, ltr501_resume); > > static const struct acpi_device_id ltr_acpi_match[] = { > - { "LTER0501", ltr501 }, > - { "LTER0559", ltr559 }, > { "LTER0301", ltr301 }, > { }, > };
