On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 22:04:53 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> By using ACPI_HANDLE() the handler argument can be retrieved directly.
> Replace ACPI_COMPANION() + dereference with ACPI_HANDLE().
>
> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
There are two of you? That explains so many things ;)
Anyhow, whilst a little unusual fair enough that you sent this with different
hats on.
Applied.
> ---
> drivers/iio/industrialio-acpi.c | 10 +++++++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-acpi.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-acpi.c
> index 981b75d40780..1e46908f9534 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-acpi.c
> @@ -28,17 +28,21 @@ bool iio_read_acpi_mount_matrix(struct device *dev,
> char *acpi_method)
> {
> struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
> - struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
> char *str;
> union acpi_object *obj, *elements;
> + acpi_handle handle;
> acpi_status status;
> int i, j, val[3];
> bool ret = false;
>
> - if (!adev || !acpi_has_method(adev->handle, acpi_method))
> + handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev);
> + if (!handle)
> return false;
>
> - status = acpi_evaluate_object(adev->handle, acpi_method, NULL, &buffer);
> + if (!acpi_has_method(handle, acpi_method))
> + return false;
> +
> + status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, acpi_method, NULL, &buffer);
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> dev_err(dev, "Failed to get ACPI mount matrix: %d\n", status);
> return false;
