On Sat, 2024-10-05 at 19:06 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 20:41:12 +0200
> Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > If hid_sensor_set_report_latency() fails, the error code should be
> > returned
> > instead of a value likely to be interpreted as 'success'.
> >
> > Fixes: 138bc7969c24 ("iio: hid-sensor-hub: Implement batch mode")
> > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > This patch is speculative.
> >
> > The code just *looks* wrong to me. No strong opinion, if it is done
> > on
> > purpose or not.
> Agreed it smells :) But I'd like more eyes on this before I take the
> fix
> as maybe there is something subtle going on.
>
The original HID sensor spec HUTRR39 didn't have this property (usage
ID 0x31B). This was added by update "HUTRR59" to support batch mode to
improve power.
This attribute will not be present on non batch mode supported system
and on supported system this attribute writes will not fail unless some
hardware error.
Returning error is fine.
Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Srinivas
> J
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-trigger.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-trigger.c
> > b/drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-trigger.c
> > index ad8910e6ad59..abb09fefc792 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-trigger.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-trigger.c
> > @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static ssize_t
> > _hid_sensor_set_report_latency(struct device *dev,
> > latency = integer * 1000 + fract / 1000;
> > ret = hid_sensor_set_report_latency(attrb, latency);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > - return len;
> > + return ret;
> >
> > attrb->latency_ms = hid_sensor_get_report_latency(attrb);
> >
>
