Re: [PATCH 1/3] cleanup: add conditional guard helper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/4/24 12:34 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> [ add Fabio ]
> 
> David Lechner wrote:
>> Add a new if_not_cond_guard() macro to cleanup.h for handling
>> conditional guards such as mutext_trylock().
>>
>> This is more ergonomic than scoped_cond_guard() for most use cases.
>> Instead of hiding the error handling statement in the macro args, it
>> works like a normal if statement and allow the error path to be indented
>> while the normal code flow path is not indented. And it avoid unwanted
>> side-effect from hidden for loop in scoped_cond_guard().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Hi David,
> 
> When you update this to the if_not_guard() name can you also add Fabio as a
> co-developer? His work [1] contributed to eliciting the response from Linus,
> and then this patch takes the novel additional step to create an "if ()" macro.
> 
> Thanks for pushing this forward!
> 
> [1]: http://lore.kernel.org/20240130164059.25130-1-fabio.maria.de.francesco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Sure, I didn't dig deep enough to find that patch, but basically
the same idea. :-)






[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux