On 9/6/24 12:42 AM, Nuno Sá wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-09-05 at 14:19 -0500, David Lechner wrote:
>> On 9/5/24 10:17 AM, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
>>> From: Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Change to obtain the fdt use case as reported in the
>>> adi,ad3552r.yaml file in this patchset, with the DAC device that
>>> is actually using the backend set as a child node of the backend.
>>>
>>> To obtain this, registering all the child fdt nodes as platform
>>> devices.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Co-developed-by: David Lechner <dlechner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Co-developed-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/iio/dac/adi-axi-dac.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/adi-axi-dac.c b/drivers/iio/dac/adi-axi-dac.c
>>> index cc31e1dcd1df..e883cd557b6a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iio/dac/adi-axi-dac.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iio/dac/adi-axi-dac.c
>>> @@ -783,6 +783,7 @@ static int axi_dac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> {
>>> struct axi_dac_state *st;
>>> const struct axi_dac_info *info;
>>> + struct platform_device *child_pdev;
>>> void __iomem *base;
>>> unsigned int ver;
>>> struct clk *clk;
>>> @@ -862,6 +863,20 @@ static int axi_dac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret,
>>> "failed to register iio backend\n");
>>>
>>> + device_for_each_child_node_scoped(&pdev->dev, child) {
>>
>> This should use fwnode_for_each_available_child_node() so that it skips
>> nodes with status != "okay".
>>
>
> device_for_each_child_node() already only looks at available nodes IIRC
>
> - Nuno Sá
>
Ah, you are right, I did not dig deep enough.
