Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] iio: chemical: bme680: Driver cleanup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 1 Jul 2024 19:00:49 +0200
Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 01:44:52PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 22:26:40 +0200
> > Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >   
> > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 01:38:11AM +0200, Vasileios Amoiridis wrote:  
> > > > Based on fixes-togreg as the 4 first commits are already applied
> > > > 
> > > > Patch 1/15: Added comment for explanation of what mutex is used for
> > > > 
> > > > Patch 2/15: Removed fixes tag
> > > > 
> > > > Patch 3-15/15: Reworded the commit messages to come close to convention
> > > > 	       of 75 chars per line.
> > > > 
> > > > v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240606212313.207550-1-vassilisamir@xxxxxxxxx/
> > > > 
> > > > Patch 4/19:
> > > > 	- Combined the bme680_conversion_time_us() and bme680_wait_for_eoc()
> > > > 	  into one function.
> > > > 	- Added better comment for the calculation.
> > > > 	- Added checks in the bme680_wait_for_eoc() function.
> > > > 
> > > > Patch 5/19:
> > > > 	- Fixed typo in commit message.
> > > > 
> > > > Patch 6/19:
> > > > 	- Added a fixes tag since without the mutexes, read operations can be
> > > > 	  broken.
> > > > 
> > > > Patch 10/19:
> > > > 	- Converted shifting operation to FIELD_GET()
> > > > 
> > > > Patch 11/19:
> > > > 	- Changed convention from &data->bufer[0] to data->buffer.
> > > > 	- Removed IIO_DMA_MINALIGN as it is not needed anymore.
> > > > 
> > > > Patch 13/19:
> > > > 	- Removed IIO_DMA_MINALIGN
> > > > 
> > > > Patch 14/19:
> > > > 	- Splitted from Patch v1 14/19
> > > > 
> > > > Patch 15/19:
> > > > 	- Splitted from Patch v1 14/19
> > > > 
> > > > Patch 16/19: **NEW**
> > > > 	- Use dev_err_probe() where applicable.
> > > > 
> > > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240527183805.311501-1-vassilisamir@xxxxxxxxx/
> > > > 
> > > > This started as a series to add support for buffers and the new
> > > > BME688 but it ended up being just a cleaning series. These might
> > > > be quite some patches for such a thing but I feel that they are
> > > > are well split, in order to allow for better review.
> > > > 
> > > > The patches are mostly small changes but essential for the correct use
> > > > of the driver. The first patches looked like fixes that should be
> > > > marked for the stable. Patches [11,17/17] might be a bit bigger but 11/17
> > > > is quite straightforward and 17/17 is basically a duplication of a
> > > > very similar commit coming from the BMP280 driver [1].
> > > > 
> > > > In general, the datasheet [2] of the driver is not very descriptive,
> > > > and it redirects the user to the BME68x Sensor API [3]. All the things
> > > > that were identified from the BME68x Sensor API have been marked with
> > > > links to the original locations of the GitHub code. If this is too much
> > > > and we don't want this type of information on the commit message, please
> > > > let me know and I will fix it.
> > > > 
> > > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240512230524.53990-1-vassilisamir@xxxxxxxxx/T/#mc6f814e9a4f8c2b39015909d174c7013b3648b9b
> > > > [2]: https://www.bosch-sensortec.com/media/boschsensortec/downloads/datasheets/bst-bme680-ds001.pdf
> > > > [3]: https://github.com/boschsensortec/BME68x_SensorAPI/tree/master
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Vasileios Amoiridis (15):
> > > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Fix read/write ops to device by adding mutexes
> > > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Fix typo in define
> > > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Drop unnecessary casts and correct adc data
> > > >     types
> > > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Remove remaining ACPI-only stuff
> > > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Sort headers alphabetically
> > > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Remove duplicate register read
> > > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Use bulk reads for calibration data
> > > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Allocate IIO device before chip initialization
> > > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Add read buffers in read/write buffer union
> > > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Make error checks consistent
> > > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Modify startup procedure
> > > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Move probe errors to dev_err_probe()
> > > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Remove redundant gas configuration
> > > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Move forced mode setup in ->read_raw()
> > > >   iio: chemical: bme680: Refactorize reading functions
> > > > 
> > > >  drivers/iio/chemical/bme680.h      |  41 +-
> > > >  drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_core.c | 631 +++++++++++++----------------
> > > >  2 files changed, 291 insertions(+), 381 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > base-commit: 4241665e6ea063a9c1d734de790121a71db763fc
> > > > -- 
> > > > 2.25.1
> > > >     
> > > 
> > > Hi Jonathan,
> > > 
> > > It's been three weeks so I am just checking-in here, to be sure that this
> > > series was not lost in the countless e-mails that you receive. Totally
> > > understand the summer time on top, so no hurry at all, just checking in
> > > that it is not lost! :) Thanks for the amazing job with the reviews
> > > though anyways! :)  
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > It's stalled because of a tree management issue - that is the first
> > few patches were going through fixes-togreg and I'd like to keep
> > the merge fun simple which means they have to end up upstream and
> > back in char-misc/char-misc-next which I then rebase on after
> > an IIO pull request.
> > 
> > They are in char-misc-next as of about 45 mins ago.
> > 
> > It'll be a bit tight for this cycle but my plan is 2 more pull requests
> > with the last one at risk because of timing.  This stuff can only be
> > in that final pull request.
> > 
> > Once it's all in place I will take a final look for but not anticipating
> > needing any changes.
> > 
> > Jonathan
> >   
> 
> Hi Jonathan,
> 
> Ok, since it is not lost perfect! No need to hurry or anything. Thanks!

Applied to the testing branch of iio.git.
Unfortunately the tree juggling meant this hit what is probably a few days
too late to get another pull request out for 6.11.  Hence I'm now treating
this as 6.12 material.  The tree will be rebased  on 6.11-rc1 once available
and pushed out then as togreg with linux-next picking that up.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> 
> Cheers,
> Vasilis
> 
> > 
> >   
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > Vasilis
> > >   
> >   





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux