Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] counter: stm32-timer-cnt: Use TIM_DIER_CCxIE(x) instead of TIM_DIER_CCxIE(x)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 10:56:15PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 06:38:38PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > Which patches need to be in the pull-request and which can be hoovered
> > up by their associated subsystems?
> 
> The dependencies are as follows:
> 
> 	#1 <- #2 <- #3 <- #4
> 	       ^
> 	      #5
> 
> So the practical options are (in the order of my not very strong preference):
> 
>  - Immutable branch with #1 - #4 (assuming William is ok to let you
>    merge #3), and then I can add #5 (and further work on the pwm-stm32
>    driver that I'm currently working on). Maybe William even doesn't
>    need to pull; I didn't check.
> 
>  - Immutable branch with only #1 and #2. Then William can pull and add
>    #3 and I can pull and add #5. #4 can be applied later then.
>    (I can remind about #4 in the next cycle.)
> 
>  - Immutable branch with #1 - #5
>    (Reminder: In that case please fixup the pwm patch's short log with
>    s/-/: /)
>    I would add this for sure to the pwm tree. I didn't even try to check
>    if it's needed for mfd and/or counter. So if you don't need it, I
>    volunteer to create that branch, but if you want to do it, that's
>    just fine, too.

I wonder what's the state here. Maybe Lee waiting for William to send an
Ack that Lee can do the first option?

Best regards
Uwe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux