RE: [PATCH v4 4/5] dt-bindings: iio: dac: Add adi,ltc2672.yaml

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2024 1:38 AM
> To: Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Paller, Kim Seer <KimSeer.Paller@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jonathan Cameron
> <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; David Lechner <dlechner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Lars-
> Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>; Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@xxxxxxxxx>;
> Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>; Dimitri Fedrau <dima.fedrau@xxxxxxxxx>;
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> Conor Dooley <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Hennerich, Michael
> <Michael.Hennerich@xxxxxxxxxx>; Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] dt-bindings: iio: dac: Add adi,ltc2672.yaml
> 
> [External]
> 
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 18:00:24 +0100
> Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 03:26:26PM +0000, Paller, Kim Seer wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2024 9:44 PM
> > > > To: Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: Paller, Kim Seer <KimSeer.Paller@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-
> > > > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > > David Lechner <dlechner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Lars-Peter Clausen
> > > > <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>; Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@xxxxxxxxx>; Mark
> Brown
> > > > <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>; Dimitri Fedrau <dima.fedrau@xxxxxxxxx>;
> Krzysztof
> > > > Kozlowski <krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>; Conor
> > > > Dooley <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Hennerich, Michael
> > > > <Michael.Hennerich@xxxxxxxxxx>; Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] dt-bindings: iio: dac: Add adi,ltc2672.yaml
> > > >
> > > > [External]
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 18:57:59 +0100
> > > > Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 02:49:03PM +0800, Kim Seer Paller wrote:
> > > > > > +patternProperties:
> > > > > > +  "^channel@[0-4]$":
> > > > > > +    type: object
> > > > > > +    additionalProperties: false
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +    properties:
> > > > > > +      reg:
> > > > > > +        description: The channel number representing the DAC output
> > > > channel.
> > > > > > +        maximum: 4
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +      adi,toggle-mode:
> > > > > > +        description:
> > > > > > +          Set the channel as a toggle enabled channel. Toggle operation
> > > > enables
> > > > > > +          fast switching of a DAC output between two different DAC
> codes
> > > > without
> > > > > > +          any SPI transaction.
> > > > > > +        type: boolean
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +      adi,output-range-microamp:
> > > > > > +        description: Specify the channel output full scale range.
> > > > > > +        enum: [3125000, 6250000, 12500000, 25000000, 50000000,
> > > > 100000000,
> > > > > > +               200000000, 300000000]
> > > > >
> > > > > IIO folks, is this sort of thing common/likely to exist on other DACs?
> > > >
> > > > Fair point. It is probably time to conclude this is at least moderately
> common
> > > > and generalize it - which will need a dac.yaml similar to the one we have
> for
> > > > ADCs in adc/adc.yaml.  That will need to make this a per channel node
> property
> > > > (same as the adc ones).
> > >
> > > Should I proceed with generalizing common DAC properties in this series
> and does
> >
> > I think so, yes.
> 
> Yes, that would great.

I was wondering who would be the designated maintainer for new dac.yaml?

> >
> > > this mean somehow removing these common properties from existing DAC
> bindings?
> >
> > I think that that one is up to Jonathan.
> 
> We can deprecate them.  At somepoint we can remove them form the
> documented bindings
> but we will need to keep them in drivers forever (which won't be costly in this
> case).
> 
> Jonathan
> 
> >
> > > > I'd also expect it to always take 2 values. In many cases the first will be 0
> but
> > > > that is fine.
> > > >
> > > > Jonathan
> > >
> >






[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux