On Tue, 4 Jun 2024 21:19:04 +0200 Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 08:01:07PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Sun, 2 Jun 2024 15:12:01 -0500 > > Adam Rizkalla <ajarizzo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Fix overflow when storing bmp580 temperature reading and preserve sign. > > > > > > This patch re-applies the fix in [1] after the merge conflict resolution > > > mentioned in [2]. > > > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Zin2udkXRD0+GrML@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/20240531140621.264f0848@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Adam Rizkalla <ajarizzo@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Thanks! I was just about to email about this fix currently being lost in > > linux-next. > > > > Rather than dance around this, I'm going to pull the later part of Vasielios' > > series off the togreg tree for now then reapply later once I have the fix > > in my upstream. > > > > It's a shame that we need to do the maths in driver to keep within range. > > Maybe we can be cheeky and avoid doing the division? > > I believe the IIO core formatting code should be fine with that as it > > already casts up to 64 bits to do the maths. > > > > (s64)*raw_temp * 250); > > > > bmp580_temp_coeffs = {1, 18} > > > > Anyhow, I've dropped (for now) the following patches from my togreg tree > > iio: pressure: bmp280: Generalize read_{temp,press,humid}() functions > > iio: pressure: bmp280: Add SCALE, RAW values in channels and refactorize them > > iio: pressure: bmp280: Add triggered buffer support > > > > Jonathan > > > > Hi Jonathan, Adam, > > I had mentioned it here [1], when I applied v7 of the patches that this would > happen. No worries though, I already have the new version of these 3 patches > that include Adam's fix, so when we have it upstream I can resubmit them > (no need to keep a note Jonathan, I have it) and I think we will be fine! Excellent. The fix is no in the upstream of my togreg branch. I've only pushed it out as testing for now, but if you send a version based on my testing branch or 20460472952 (currently char-misc-next head) that would be great. Thanks, Jonathan > > Cheers, > Vasilis > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240512230524.53990-1-vassilisamir@xxxxxxxxx/T/#t > > > > --- > > > drivers/iio/pressure/bmp280-core.c | 6 ++++-- > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/pressure/bmp280-core.c b/drivers/iio/pressure/bmp280-core.c > > > index 95c88b0e1c49..3a003843c79c 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/iio/pressure/bmp280-core.c > > > +++ b/drivers/iio/pressure/bmp280-core.c > > > @@ -1752,6 +1752,8 @@ static int bmp580_read_temp(struct bmp280_data *data, s32 *raw_temp) > > > dev_err(data->dev, "reading temperature skipped\n"); > > > return -EIO; > > > } > > > + *raw_temp = sign_extend32(*raw_temp, 23); > > > + *raw_temp = ((s64)*raw_temp * 1000) / (1 << 16); > > > > > > return 0; > > > } > > > @@ -2154,7 +2156,7 @@ static irqreturn_t bmp580_buffer_handler(int irq, void *p) > > > > > > static const int bmp580_oversampling_avail[] = { 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 }; > > > static const u8 bmp580_chip_ids[] = { BMP580_CHIP_ID, BMP580_CHIP_ID_ALT }; > > > -static const int bmp580_temp_coeffs[] = { 1000, 16 }; > > > +static const int bmp580_temp_coeffs[] = { 1, 0 }; > > > static const int bmp580_press_coeffs[] = { 1, 64000}; > > > > > > const struct bmp280_chip_info bmp580_chip_info = { > > > @@ -2184,7 +2186,7 @@ const struct bmp280_chip_info bmp580_chip_info = { > > > .iir_filter_coeff_default = 2, > > > > > > .temp_coeffs = bmp580_temp_coeffs, > > > - .temp_coeffs_type = IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2, > > > + .temp_coeffs_type = IIO_VAL_INT, > > > .press_coeffs = bmp580_press_coeffs, > > > .press_coeffs_type = IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL, > > > > >
