On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 18:35:32 +0200 Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Jonathan, Nuno, > > just to be sure, is there something else needed from my side > for this patch-set ? > All good now. It's queued up and so just a case of me sending a pull request to Greg KH. If he takes that it'll then be in char-misc and Greg will then send pull request to Linus when the merge window opens. Jonathan > > Thanks, > regards, > angelo > > On 28/05/24 9:16 PM, Angelo Dureghello wrote: > > Hi Jonathan, > > > > On 25/05/24 7:06 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > >> On Thu, 23 May 2024 14:45:01 +0200 > >> Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, 2024-05-22 at 17:01 +0200, Angelo Dureghello wrote: > >>>> From: Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> > >>>> After testing this driver, add some minor fixes and improvements, > >>>> as adding single channel variants support (ad3541r, ad3551r), also > >>>> as a > >>>> preparatory step to bigger future improvements related to fast-rate > >>>> mode > >>>> for this DAC family. > >>>> > >>>> Previous patches (v1, 3/3) > >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240510141836.1624009-1-adureghello@xxxxxxxxxxxx > >>>> > >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240510141836.1624009-2-adureghello@xxxxxxxxxxxx/ > >>>> > >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240510141836.1624009-3-adureghello@xxxxxxxxxxxx/ > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Angelo Dureghello (6): > >>>> dt-bindings: iio: dac: fix ad3552r gain parameter names > >>>> dt-bindings: iio: dac: add ad35xxr single output variants > >>>> iio: dac: ad3552r: add model data structure > >>>> iio: dac: ad3552r: add support for ad3541r and ad3551r > >>>> iio: dac: ad3552r: change AD3552R_NUM_CH define name > >>>> iio: dac: ad3552r: uniform structure names > >>>> > >>>> .../bindings/iio/dac/adi,ad3552r.yaml | 43 ++++-- > >>>> drivers/iio/dac/ad3552r.c | 140 > >>>> ++++++++++++------ > >>>> 2 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-) > >>> Reviewed-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> > >> This series crossed with a series using > >> device_for_each_child_node_scoped() > >> > >> I've rebased on top of that. Was moderately straightforwards but > >> given last week I messed a similar change up completely please > >> check the testing branch of iio.git! > >> > >> The mess was all it the patch adding model_data > > > > i tested the driver from the iio testing beranch, > > it works as expected. > > > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Jonathan > > > > Thanks, > > > > Regards, > > angelo > > > >
