Re: [PATCH v2] staging: iio: adt7316: remove unused struct 'adt7316_limit_regs'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 05:00:55PM +0100, linux@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 'adt7316_limit_regs' has never been used since the original
> commit 35f6b6b86ede ("staging: iio: new ADT7316/7/8 and ADT7516/7/9
> driver").
> 
> The comment above it is a copy-and-paste from a different struct.
> 
> Remove both the struct and the comment.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c | 9 ---------
>  1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c b/drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c
> index 79467f056a05..f4260786d50a 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/addac/adt7316.c
> @@ -209,15 +209,6 @@ struct adt7316_chip_info {
>  #define ADT7316_TEMP_AIN_INT_MASK	\
>  	(ADT7316_TEMP_INT_MASK)
>  
> -/*
> - * struct adt7316_chip_info - chip specific information
> - */
> -
> -struct adt7316_limit_regs {
> -	u16	data_high;
> -	u16	data_low;
> -};
> -
>  static ssize_t adt7316_show_enabled(struct device *dev,
>  				    struct device_attribute *attr,
>  				    char *buf)
> -- 
> 2.45.1
> 
> 

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you
  did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version.
  Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the
  kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what
  needs to be done here to properly describe this.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.org]

  Powered by Linux